Friday, November 30, 2012

What does it mean to be involved in a "tradition"?

[This post has been quite revised, relatively speaking.  That's what happens when one serves two masters - Mammon being one of them.]

This is a follow up from the previous post, and also to a certain extent, from Budo Bum's comment -wonderful idea, that - a dojo with a group of committed, senior students with experience training in Japan.  What serious budo teacher here has not dreamed of that?  But, to paraphrase a now-disgraced defense secretary, you go to okeiko with the students you have.  I have lowered my expectations to the point where I am just happy happy happy to have people to train with - it's my major motivation as a teacher.

What does it mean for a non-Japanese person not living in Japan to become part of a koryu tradition?  Is such a thing possible?  Some would say no, or give a qualified yes - it's possible to join a tradition, but like the anthropologist deciding to take membership in the group she is studying, her presence will alter the dynamic of the group in ways it has never seen before (and probably make her resarch obsolete).  Rather than relatively slow generational change, a tradition that opens itself up to foreign students will experience a change in dynamics.

After years of seeing and observing traditional groups become more involved in the non-Japanese world, I would have to say the phenomenon is a mixed bag.  It's been a real blessing for sumo, apparently (which is not budo, but it is definitely a tradition).  The entry of foreigners into competition has raised the profile of what was a hidebound sport form, raising its profile internationally in a way that would never have happened otherwise, and providing more entertainment value for Japanese and international audiences.  (Though as I said in a previous post, attempting to export sumo has not worked out so well). 

On the other hand, another koryu budo tradition that I have seen become established in the United States has suffered, I think, a sense of an Americanized idea of what it means to belong to a tradition.  I am not sure what the Japanese honbu's ideas were when it gave permission to establish this particular branch here (and I hope readers can understand my reluctance to name names), but I believe part of the plan was for the style to spread throughout the US.  The leaders of the US group apparently studied some "how to grow your franchise" type books and implemented a branding plan.  Everyone who studied the style had to wear the same keikogi, with variations that indicated rank in the ryuha (beginners had to wear judo gi, ikkyu and above could wear hakama with white keikogi, sandan and above could black keikogi, etc.).  Everyone wore patches.  When visiting the old country, everyone in the group had to wear uniform shirts when appearing in public.  

Needless to say, when training in Japan, the US students were objects of curiosity.  In a country that is much more into uniforms than anyone here is, the lookalike shirts nevertheless created murmurs on public transportation - uniforms were for work, or for a sports team, but for a bunch of US budoka on a training vacation?  The keikogi uniforms created interest on the dojo floor also, where the standard black, patchless keikogi and hakama are considered normal for iai practice.  (Some groups are more motley, and there are no particular rules.)

One of my ex-colleagues remarked that the leaders of the US group were "more Japanese than the Japanese."  I always thought this was insulting to everyone concerned - what it was, was budo as interpreted through a corporate America lens. 

We don't have much here in the way of traditions - Thanksgiving is really our only American holiday, and immigrant families bring their own traditions to bear (a harvest festival is one of those things that's very close to universal).  The US as a nation exists on borrowed traditions from different places and times.  Sometimes our parents' and grandparents' traditions (ex football), sometimes traditions adopted from other times and other cultures. 

In fact, the alacrity with which some of us put on the personae of other cultures is surprisingly, and I think distressingly, eager.  One person, whom I know slightly, found out that one of his forbears was Native American, and went all out adopting what he thought the dress of his ancestral band must have looked like.  Once he was just a white guy, now he's Leaping Sparrow, or something.  (Should it go without saying that, unless they are involved in a ceremony of some sort, Native Americans dress pretty much like the rest of us?)  Another I know slightly better has decided that Japan is a place where women walk elegantly in kimono and everyone is very, very nice to each other - all the time.  He and his wife sprinkle Japanese words into conversations (she is European, he is Hispanic).  The image they hold is charming, but inaccurate.

Japan is definitely one of those places where pretty much no matter what you ever do, you will always remain something of an outsider.  I don't consider this a problem, really, but it makes me uncomfortable to meet foreigners in Japan who don't understand that point.  One of my former sempai who has lived in Japan for many, many years also says he still does not think he fully understands the culture, and he is surprised when he sometimes meets foreign visitors who are convinced they (as they put it) "get it." 

We cannot shed our original cultural trappings.  I sometimes tell curious people that I am a "Presbyterian Buddhist" (and the reactions range from one person's snorting with laughter to another's solumn look of essentially ignorant acceptance and respect).  I was raised protestant, and now I am - not sure.  And since I find it incredibly rude that anyone would make assumptions about another person's faith (not just my own) I have come up with that confounding rejoinder.  Whatever else it conveys, it shows that I do not feel I can entirely escape my background, and furthermore, I don't want to.

As for our involvement in traditional ryuha, I think we must tread carefully to respect the training we have been admitted to, but to pay attention always to our unique place in it.  When we go to another culture for training, we will adapt, but we will also be adapted to.  We will have an impact by our presence and there is no way to avoid it.  And that can be a good thing.  In spite of the silliness I mentioned above, the ryuha with the US franchise has yielded some benefit for the Japanese honbu.  And the US students are getting a strict, if slightly slanted, training in a very old tradition, a win for them that cranky thinkers like me don't make much difference to. 
 

3 comments:

  1. Koryu budo traditions are living traditions, so change should be expected. I understand that I'm not doing things exactly as the samurai did them 150 or 200 or 400 years ago, but a lot of students do expect their koryu to be unchanged from centuries past. Contact with the changing world affects them and you're quite right, having a non-Japanese student in the dojo will change the training, even in Japan. I'm inclined to believe that this is a good thing. It's part of, and a sign of, a ryuha growing and changing and adapting to continue being relevant in a changing world. If the ryuha and its training didn't change a little bit in response to new students with new perspectives and experiences, I would be worried that the ryuha is no longer a living tradition, but has become a fossil instead. This is really rambling. Do I make any sense at all?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You always make sense. But, it's surprising how many non-Japanese who want to study a koryu seem to think everyone still sits around the castle in their oyoroi (I mention this image specifically because I once reviewed a specious book on swordsmanship a number of years ago that featured just such a photo). And there are less than scrupulous teachers who will use almost any tactic to engage students, a nod to hoary antiquity among them, since, as I said, many Americans specifically are looking for that sense of history. Trouble is, they have a wrongheaded idea of what that sense of history actually looks like.

    It's reasonable to assume change in koryu, but not everyone I come across is reasonable!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reasonableness is a wonderful characteristic in new students. The fantasies we have to slowly educate out of them. It's a tough job, especially with, as you note, the people who are happy to encourage ignorance for their own gain.

    ReplyDelete